Welter greats Mayweather would have ducked

[them_apples]

Not as afraid of Floyd being in an actual 50 50 fight

In 2010 he should have saved everybody some time by just saying Manny Pacquiao is too dangerous to fight right now

We would have understood Manny was beating the brakes off fighters

I couldn’t agree more, the whole world knows he ducked any inkling of risk. This is why everyone talks **** about him

[travestyny]

I couldn�t agree more, the whole world knows he ducked any inkling of risk. This is why everyone talks **** about him

I'm just wondering why no one here will answer my question, but you seem reasonable.


Do you think Pacquaio needed 3 weeks to recover from giving blood, or do you think 2 weeks was reasonable?

[Haka]

I'm just wondering why no one here will answer my question, but you seem reasonable.


Do you think Pacquaio needed 3 weeks to recover from giving blood, or do you think 2 weeks was reasonable?

The defamation lawsuit is already ruled in court in favor of Pac. It was only ever part of a smear campaign which you keep on resorting to.

[travestyny]

The defamation lawsuit is already ruled in court in favor of Pac. It was only ever part of a smear campaign which you keep on resorting to.

I haven't mentioned one thing about the defamation lawsuit. You're blatantly resorting to lying now.

But let's see if you will answer the question:
Do you think Pacquaio needed 3 weeks to recover from giving blood, or do you think 2 weeks was reasonable?



That's now 4 of you I've asked. And no one will go near it for some odd reason. I wonder why!



Oh, that's right. It's a "gotcha" question that I'm not allowed to ask because apparently it doesn't leave the appropriate amount of wiggle room for you guys to support your argument, according to Willie-Pep the lying, ducking coward

[Haka]

I haven't mentioned one thing about the defamation lawsuit. You're blatantly resorting to lying now.

But let's see if you will answer the question:
Do you think Pacquaio needed 3 weeks to recover from giving blood, or do you think 2 weeks was reasonable?



That's now 4 of you I've asked. And no one will go near it for some odd reason. I wonder why!



Oh, that's right. It's a "gotcha" question that I'm not allowed to ask because apparently it doesn't leave the appropriate amount of wiggle room for you guys to support your argument, according to Willie-Pep the lying, ducking coward

You have no proof the other party would follow through with it on their part so it is a baseless question regardless.

[travestyny]

You have no proof the other party would follow through with it on their part so it is a baseless question regardless.

I have proof that one side wouldn't follow through with it, now don't I?


Now your argument is essentially, "Well one boxer ducked the fight, but if he hadn't, there is no proof that the other one wouldn't have ducked the fight too. So it doesn't matter" LMAO. What a colorful argument!



Yall just keep ducking...and ducking...and ducking.....
If you want a conversation we can have one. If you want to quote me to preach from a soapbox, that's not going to happen.

[djtmal]

You have no proof the other party would follow through with it on their part so it is a baseless question regardless.

Nobody's bothering because this weirdo refuses to accept it was Floyd Mayweather who wanted additional testing as a result of his accusations, which was baseless and unfounded, and if he didn't want to fight Manny Pacquiao with a 24 day or 14 day cutoff, that was on him.

And when the fight did happen in 2015 and Manny went through with everything what happened, Floyd gets popped with Illegal Iv filled with masking agents.

[travestyny]

Nobody's bothering because this weirdo refuses to accept it was Floyd Mayweather who wanted additional testing as a result of his accusations, which was baseless and unfounded, and if he didn't want to fight Manny Pacquiao with a 24 day or 14 day cutoff, that was on him.

And when the fight did happen in 2015 and Manny went through with everything what happened, Floyd gets popped with Illegal Iv filled with masking agents.

Then answer the simple questions posed.

Duck duck duck


I know why you guys are ducking

[Haka]

I have proof that one side wouldn't follow through with it, now don't I?


Now your argument is essentially, "Well one boxer ducked the fight, but if he hadn't, there is no proof that the other one wouldn't have ducked the fight too. So it doesn't matter" LMAO. What a colorful argument!



Yall just keep ducking...and ducking...and ducking.....
If you want a conversation we can have one. If you want to quote me to preach from a soapbox, that's not going to happen.

You assert things without substance, the only proof you have is that one party kept making demands, there has never been OST before or after.

[travestyny]

You assert things without substance, the only proof you have is that one party kept making demands, there has never been OST before or after.

They were in mediation. I'm sure that's pretty substantive

I have proof that one side declined an extremely reasonable offer, and that's why you guys froze up and won't answer any of my questions.

Why did the first negotiation end? Because Pacquaio refused to accept a 14 day cut-off, correct?

Or is that another question you won't answer? Let me know, because you know I have the proof if you deny this.