Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does D.Trump want a land grab?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Why does D.Trump want a land grab?

    Seems pretty straight forward but I'll explain a bit, I guess. Just to fill out the thread that is really just an open question:

    Pres says he wants Greenland. Weird, but also, dope. Apparently the world didn't like that idea.

    Then Trump is like alright let me get that Panama Canal back then. To which Panama, in a shocking twist that surprised absolutely **** all no one, said "Nah doe bro"

    this ****ing guy just tilts his head back and says "Let me get ****, Ima turn that bish out and turn it into the Riviera of the Middle East"


    So dude clearly wants a land grab right? These ain't even really, you know, choice. You might think Panama is but not really, they got that canal we dug them and a **** ton of jungle. Like super dense jungle. Like so dense bro, my ancestors went around that hoe using canoes in the gulf. So really they just have that canal the US dug them ... well .. kinda ... it was the native who did the actual digging, peace be upon them.

    I just don't get why, but also, I don't understand the world's reaction to the idea. Like why TF shouldn't we give president trump ****? How TF does he do any worse? Honestly, I'd give **** to America's enemies too, same reason, how TF do they do any worse? Let the ****ing Taliban have a go, they will clean **** up. Let the GD Pope, Trump, Xi, *****, King Chuckie, IDGAF, have Bezzos and Musk take over. How TF did he get a no on this too?

    I'm not a Trump supporter you guys. I just don't like government in general and absolutely hate bureaucracy so generally politics is easy for me. A debate won't make me richer and rich people poorer, get me? So IDGAF, I don't pay attention, I don't like or even want to like either side. But geo-politics usually makes more sense. It's usually more economic and geographically based and the nations tend to do what's best for themselves so it's simple and makes sense. America buying and turning the holy land into a well maintained resort sounds like a good ****ing idea to me.

    Is it just anti-trump-ism? Y'all really think Israel's doing a good job? The *********** government? Who has the boots and the money to even actually try to clean that **** up if not America?
    sceneboxing sceneboxing likes this.

    #2
    panama canal makes sense.

    greenland sure

    canada, **** that if we get canada its full of millions of imported indians and all of their other problems, then it will be america's problem to fix canada
    brodbombefly Marchegiano likes this.

    Comment


      #3
      I didn't even know about Canada.

      Comment


        #4
        - - Rump just loves making the news with asinine comments that stir up the soft craniums of soft lads and lassies.
        Mr Mitts Mr Mitts likes this.

        Comment


          #5
          Trump knows how to kick start discussions on an issue by stirring things up with radical proposals. That is what you are seeing now. There are fewer than 59,000 people on Greenland. I am sure we could accommodate them, since there are more illegals slipping through our borders every month. Let's see if she is for sale first. Maybe Denmark will say why not.

          As for Gaza, it may be the only way. Give those people an alternative to scraping up rubble and a great many of them will forget jihad and go to work. Don't take everything at face value; it is just a kick start.

          Let's look at some good things already accomplished. It is hard to find a liberal or any sensible person who believes men should compete against women in sports. That cancer has been quickly irradiated. That is called following the will of the people. Our president is also following the will of the people by choking off our border.

          Another good thing he will probably do is shut down Soros-backed radio stations now broadcasting the exact locations of ICE agents working an area, even supplying descriptions of their undercover vehicles. Cut off the head and the body dies.

          Some say they do not like governments at all. I agree, however with a large caveat. There is no alternative to government, period. So the best a man can ever do is to hope and try to ensure he has a good one.
          Last edited by Mr Mitts; 02-06-2025, 07:22 PM.

          Comment


            #6
            Just to push a distracting narrative while they continue to build an economy which is entirely automated. Look at the tariffs thing, a whole lot of noise that resulted in absolutely nothing but people being distracted by it.

            Eventually you'll see heads of state in the western hemisphere at least floating the idea about the nation state being an outdated concept, which it is and then you'll be closer to a one world gubment.
            Mr Mitts Mr Mitts likes this.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
              Just to push a distracting narrative while they continue to build an economy which is entirely automated. Look at the tariffs thing, a whole lot of noise that resulted in absolutely nothing but people being distracted by it.

              Eventually you'll see heads of state in the western hemisphere at least floating the idea about the nation state being an outdated concept, which it is and then you'll be closer to a one world gubment.
              Other than one world government there could be intermediate steps, like some countries in Europe do it first. The big or wealthy countries elsewhere and all commies will of course hold out--Russia, China, N Korea, Australia, USA, almost every Moslem country who theoretically might do it themselves.

              It would probably reduce the problem down to three factions eventually--commies, Moslem countries and the free world. You take it from there.
              Last edited by Mr Mitts; 02-07-2025, 03:05 AM.
              Spray_resistant Spray_resistant likes this.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
                Seems pretty straight forward but I'll explain a bit, I guess. Just to fill out the thread that is really just an open question:

                Pres says he wants Greenland. Weird, but also, dope. Apparently the world didn't like that idea.

                Then ***** is like alright let me get that Panama Canal back then. To which Panama, in a shocking twist that surprised absolutely **** all no one, said "Nah doe bro"

                this ****ing guy just tilts his head back and says "Let me get ****, Ima turn that bish out and turn it into the Riviera of the Middle East"


                So dude clearly wants a land grab right? These ain't even really, you know, choice. You might think Panama is but not really, they got that canal we dug them and a **** ton of jungle. Like super dense jungle. Like so dense bro, my ancestors went around that hoe using canoes in the gulf. So really they just have that canal the US dug them ... well .. kinda ... it was the native who did the actual digging, peace be upon them.

                I just don't get why, but also, I don't understand the world's reaction to the idea. Like why TF shouldn't we give president ***** ****? How TF does he do any worse? Honestly, I'd give **** to America's enemies too, same reason, how TF do they do any worse? Let the ****ing Taliban have a go, they will clean **** up. Let the GD Pope, *****, Xi, *****, King Chuckie, IDGAF, have Bezzos and Musk take over. How TF did he get a no on this too?

                I'm not a ***** supporter you guys. I just don't like government in general and absolutely hate bureaucracy so generally politics is easy for me. A debate won't make me richer and rich people poorer, get me? So IDGAF, I don't pay attention, I don't like or even want to like either side. But geo-politics usually makes more sense. It's usually more economic and geographically based and the nations tend to do what's best for themselves so it's simple and makes sense. America buying and turning the holy land into a well maintained resort sounds like a good ****ing idea to me.

                Is it just anti-*****-ism? Y'all really think Israel's doing a good job? The *********** government? Who has the boots and the money to even actually try to clean that **** up if not America?
                - - Rump certainly knows how push U buttons. Blame Dems for 4 more years and then try again not to repeat getting U buttons pushed...

                Comment


                  #9
                  China is making some moves around the area of the Panama Canal. That obviously is unacceptable and the U.S. for strategic reasons can’t let a rival power control the canal.

                  Greenland also has strategic importance, for its natural resources and proximity to ocean routes that are opening up as Arctic ice is melting.
                  bimhead bimhead Dr Z Dr Z like this.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mr Mitts View Post

                    Other than one world government there could be intermediate steps, like some countries in Europe do it first. The big or wealthy countries elsewhere and all commies will of course hold out--Russia, China, N Korea, Australia, USA, almost every Moslem country who theoretically might do it themselves.

                    It would probably reduce the problem down to three factions eventually--commies, Moslem countries and the free world. You take it from there.
                    These things have to come in phases because people don't respond well to immediate change. China is a big obstacle and the Moslem world in this scenario would be swallowed up very quickly. Its already in effect with Israel being the strongest power back by the US in the region and G@za apparently being turned into a tourist resort or whatever. I expect alot of the Moslems will just be relocated to all different countries so they're spread out and small in numbers.

                    I just noticed Donnie mentioned more tarriffs just like last week at the end of the trading day, hmmm? market manipulation to help out his billionaire cronies maybe?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP