Gene Tunney is 65-1-1 at Box Rec.
But consider this:
I think Tunney was an outstanding boxer with a sterling record to match. He was never down except for the match vs. Dempsey, though I could be mistaken as new information comes on the old timers every do often. He retired in his prime, not sticking around to face Schemling, or Sharkey though I think he would have beaten them both in 1929 and 1930. And he did offer a past his prime Wills a fight.
I think his first fight with Greb he should be the winner on DQ or at least the fight should have been a No Contest.
Consider this news which there is no know film of:
According to various accounts, there are claims that Harry Greb used fouls during his fight against Gene Tunney on May 23, 1922, where he handed Tunney his only official defeat. Tunney himself described the fight in detail, mentioning the brutality and suggesting that Greb employed tactics that could be considered fouls:
- Tunney noted that Greb was using every trick and foul he had learned in his boxing career, which included headbutting Tunney multiple times during their bout. This is supported by reports that Tunney's nose was broken and his face was severely cut during the fight.
- There are also claims that Greb was known for appealing to illicit resources during fights, including in this match against Tunney, where he allegedly headbutted Tunney to break his nasal septum in round one.
There was a lot of blood on Tunney's face, but he was a not retreat no surrender type of fighter and went 15 hard rounds with the busted nose and his face covered in blood. When the fight ended, the crowd gave him a standing ovation for his courage. 9 out of 10 guys would have quit.
So in theory he could have been undefeated if the fouls by Greb were called and the fight he officially lost in the 5 fight series was ruled a NC or DQ. A great what if.
Comment