Originally posted by Sid-Knee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Brian Mendoza Arrives in Australia, Expects a Fire-Fight With Tim Tszyu
Collapse
-
Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post
Andre Ward, Bud Crawford, Floyd and Michael Spinks had winning records against your tomato cans.
But how long did it take to come up with this measly list? Surely you can find more than one fighter with a winning record with substance? It's only the one fight, but it's something at least. Let me help you out. Frank Bruno is another one. But considering we've been fighting for well over a century, that is quite pathetic isn't it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
Wow, you actually found one with Ward. The others fought shot fighters or as you say, tomato cans. There's got to be some quality in there otherwise it's worthless. The Hatton win doesn't stand as Joe Cortez f3cked Hatton over in another example of corruption to protect the home fighter.
But how long did it take to come up with this measly list? Surely you can find more than one fighter with a winning record with substance? It's only the one fight, but it's something at least. Let me help you out. Frank Bruno is another one. But considering we've been fighting for well over a century, that is quite pathetic isn't it.
Ricky Burns was 36-2-1 and hadn't lost in six fkn years when he fought Crawford. In fact, all of Ricky's losses have been by decision. I respect Burns. He fought the final ten rounds against Rey Beltran with a broken jaw. How dare you call Burns "shot"! You're a lying sack of sht who twists facts to suit your delusional narratives.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post
Hatton was Top 10 P4P when Floyd knocked him unconscious. Mayweather didn't need Joe Cortez to knock Hatton sill that night. Many fans believe Ricky got a gift against Collazo.
Ricky Burns was 36-2-1 and hadn't lost in six fkn years when he fought Crawford. In fact, all of Ricky's losses have been by decision. I respect Burns. He fought the final ten rounds against Rey Beltran with a broken jaw. How dare you call Burns "shot"! You're a lying sack of sht who twists facts to suit your delusional narratives.
I had Hatton/Collazo 6 rounds apiece but Hatton walking away with the 1 point win due to the knockdown.
What does the record matter when you're shot? Vargas had only lost to Trinidad but was done. Lacy had only lost to Calzaghe but was done. Haha. You only need to watch Ricky clearly losing to Beltran and way behind against the Puerto Rican until he quit late in the fight to see Ricky was done. He looked nothing like he used to.
You have to get knocked out when you're shot or something? What? Where do you get this idea that you have to be stopped in a loss to prove you're shot?
I'm not the one who is delusional. I've proven it enough times with you but you still insist. That's delusion. Same goes for the narratives comment.
Comment
-
I was wondering why a thread about the arrival of a challenger on a fight that ended like a month ago kept on getting bumped, but somehow there was a long ongoing conversation about UK and US fighters (didn't read the whole thing)???
Well, since it is a thread about Australia to begin with, I might randomly add a question to see if any Australian fans are around...
I recently read that Sam Goodman called out to fight Inoue after he inevitably beats Tapales for undisputed, but given that Inoue will probably stay for maybe 2~3 more defenses tops before moving up, the timing will be limited especially since Inoue already mentioned MJ, Nery, and Casimero as the candidates. So, assuming the eliminator ends with MJ winning and Inoue fighting him as his next mandatory, will Goodman be willing to defeat Casimero to add on to his resume before Inoue cracks him? It will kill two birds with one stone that way. At first I thought I wanted to see Inoue slaughter Casimero once and for all, but seeing he's really on his downhill and not even that good in his last fight, not sure if its even worth it and frankly I think Goodman will give a better fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elheath View PostI was wondering why a thread about the arrival of a challenger on a fight that ended like a month ago kept on getting bumped, but somehow there was a long ongoing conversation about UK and US fighters (didn't read the whole thing)???
Well, since it is a thread about Australia to begin with, I might randomly add a question to see if any Australian fans are around...
I recently read that Sam Goodman called out to fight Inoue after he inevitably beats Tapales for undisputed, but given that Inoue will probably stay for maybe 2~3 more defenses tops before moving up, the timing will be limited especially since Inoue already mentioned MJ, Nery, and Casimero as the candidates. So, assuming the eliminator ends with MJ winning and Inoue fighting him as his next mandatory, will Goodman be willing to defeat Casimero to add on to his resume before Inoue cracks him? It will kill two birds with one stone that way. At first I thought I wanted to see Inoue slaughter Casimero once and for all, but seeing he's really on his downhill and not even that good in his last fight, not sure if its even worth it and frankly I think Goodman will give a better fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
No one who isn't deranged thinks Cortez reffed that one right. It was crooked as usual. That was the start of many funny fights for Cortez and his reputation dropped big time.
I had Hatton/Collazo 6 rounds apiece but Hatton walking away with the 1 point win due to the knockdown.
What does the record matter when you're shot? Vargas had only lost to Trinidad but was done. Lacy had only lost to Calzaghe but was done. Haha. You only need to watch Ricky clearly losing to Beltran and way behind against the Puerto Rican until he quit late in the fight to see Ricky was done. He looked nothing like he used to.
You have to get knocked out when you're shot or something? What? Where do you get this idea that you have to be stopped in a loss to prove you're shot?
I'm not the one who is delusional. I've proven it enough times with you but you still insist. That's delusion. Same goes for the narratives comment.
Burns isn't even shot now. The man has lost eight fights and no one has stopped him or even came close. Even Bud gives Burns his deserved props. You can't accept the fact that when our best fought your beat over the last twenty years, our guys paddled yours. Was Froch "shot" when Ward beat his azz with one hand in AC in 2011? You love to revise history because the truth hurts too much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post
Only an imbecile believes Floyd needed Cortez to beat Ricky. I guess it was Joe who hit Ricky with that check book that knocked him into the turnbuckle.
Burns isn't even shot now. The man has lost eight fights and no one has stopped him or even came close. Even Bud gives Burns his deserved props. You can't accept the fact that when our best fought your beat over the last twenty years, our guys paddled yours. Was Froch "shot" when Ward beat his azz with one hand in AC in 2011? You love to revise history because the truth hurts too much.
Burns isn't even shot now? He's beyond shot now you clown. You really need medicine, man.
You beat us in all the big ones over the last 20 years? I've already proven to you you don't. But your delusion is too strong.
No, the Ward win is legit. Learn to read you idiot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elheath View PostI was wondering why a thread about the arrival of a challenger on a fight that ended like a month ago kept on getting bumped, but somehow there was a long ongoing conversation about UK and US fighters (didn't read the whole thing)???
Well, since it is a thread about Australia to begin with, I might randomly add a question to see if any Australian fans are around...
I recently read that Sam Goodman called out to fight Inoue after he inevitably beats Tapales for undisputed, but given that Inoue will probably stay for maybe 2~3 more defenses tops before moving up, the timing will be limited especially since Inoue already mentioned MJ, Nery, and Casimero as the candidates. So, assuming the eliminator ends with MJ winning and Inoue fighting him as his next mandatory, will Goodman be willing to defeat Casimero to add on to his resume before Inoue cracks him? It will kill two birds with one stone that way. At first I thought I wanted to see Inoue slaughter Casimero once and for all, but seeing he's really on his downhill and not even that good in his last fight, not sure if its even worth it and frankly I think Goodman will give a better fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View PostGoodman is a better scalp than Cas IMO. Casimero can't hang at 122, and was exposed against Rigo.
After his rather underwhelming performance before the no contest against Oguni last month, I'm fine with Casimero not getting officially whooped by Inoue and letting someone else do it.
MJ is probably the first eliminator mandatory defense. Nery will probably be the next USA bout for Inoue so I don't want that cancelled. That leaves Casimero as the guy Goodman should be able to defeat, and convince Inoue to take the better guy now.
Comment
Comment