Pernell Whitaker vs Sugar Ray Leonard

[$Bullsfam$]

This too me is a way more competitive fight then Pernell or Leonard against Floyd. I think they both beat him with movement and activity behind the jab and would be hard as hell for Floyd to counter and I don't think he'd beat them by only throwing 20-30 punches a round. He'd have to change it up.

But this fight really interests me. I really don't know who to pick. They'd both be hard to hit. Who do you guys think takes this?

[Sugar Ram]

leonard cuz he hits harder and is equally as fast if nt faster,plus he is physically stronger also..

[them_apples]

This too me is a way more competitive fight then Pernell or Leonard against Floyd. I think they both beat him with movement and activity behind the jab and would be hard as hell for Floyd to counter and I don't think he'd beat them by only throwing 20-30 punches a round. He'd have to change it up.

But this fight really interests me. I really don't know who to pick. They'd both be hard to hit. Who do you guys think takes this?

leonard. To strong, to big to quick. See Whitaker vs all the other good big WW's.

[Silencers]

Leonard had all the physical advantages over Whitaker, he was bigger, faster, stronger, taller, rangier and was probably smarter, Whitaker wouldn't have been able to outsmart Leonard, his defense would keep him in the fight and net him some rounds but I doubt he wins.

[TBear]

Leonard had all the physical advantages over Whitaker, he was bigger, faster, stronger, taller, rangier and was probably smarter, Whitaker wouldn't have been able to outsmart Leonard, his defense would keep him in the fight and net him some rounds but I doubt he wins.

I agree again.

I feel Whitakers prime was at lightweight anyways. He was good enough to compete sucessfully at 147 but seemed undersized.