[PLEASE HELP] Would you rather fight: A gorilla or a Medieval Knight with weird and shield

[Earl-Hickey]

Following on from recent threads.

You have to fight either a tiger or a Medieval Knight in armour with a sword and shield

You are unarmed for both encounters

[Mighty_Windir]

Knight.

No one should go 1v1 with either a gorilla or a tiger.

I couldn't comprehend how big tigers and gorillas were till I went to a zoo and saw them almost face to face.

Knight could have a Glock and I'd still pick him

[Real King Kong]

I’d take the gorilla, there’s a chance he’d just defend himself and fawk off if you weren’t a threat. Although the medieval knight would probably be like 5”5 and not be able to move with the armour...I change my pick. If the knight was like Gregor kligane, I’d go with the gorilla for the above stated reasoning.

[Robbie Barrett]

Knight. A greater chance of avoiding the sword and overpowering him to take it for yourself. A tiger you're basically just ****ed.

[Larry the boss]

At least you can run from the knight....you dont even have that option with the Gorilla

[DreamerUSA]

Tiger, unarmed, lulz. Probably ****ed either way but Ill take my chances with the knight. I mean the power of a 600lb tiger vs a grown man is probably on par with grown man beating the **** out of a 5 year old.

[Zaryu]

Definitely the knight, as mentioned above too, worst case scenario I would also have a better chance outrunning a knight than a Gorilla or Tiger.

[FinitoxDinamita]

Id rather fight the slow clumsy Knight.

Id be way more cautious of a Samurai over a Knight also.

[Vinnykin]

Easy to fight a knight in a full suit of armour, rather than an agile and super strong animal like a tiger or gorilla.

Knights in armour get tired very quickly.... I would just dance around until they were struggling to lift their shield or swing their sword, then take them down and twist their helmet, snapping their neck

[Vinnykin]