Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Senate Votes to Allow FBI to Look at Your Web Browsing History Without a Warrant

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Senate Votes to Allow FBI to Look at Your Web Browsing History Without a Warrant

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is pushing forward with an ********* that would let the FBI collect records on Americans' web-browsing and search histories without a warrant this week.

    McConnell proposed the ********* as part of the renewal of the 2001 Patriot Act, The Daily Beast first reported. The Senate is voting on *********s this week.

    The McConnell ********* would let Department of Justice officials — overseen by Attorney General Bill Barr — look through anyone's browsing history without the approval of a judge if they deem the browsing history relevant to an investigation. It blocks the FBI from accessing the "content" of people's web-browsing history but would let the FBI access records detailing which sites and search terms people entered.

    The proposal has drawn backlash from a bipartisan group of senators, as well as from both ******* and conservative civil-liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Prosperity.

    ********ic Sen. Ron Wyden and ********** Sen. Steve Daines jointly proposed an ********* that would require the FBI to obtain a warrant before accessing people's web-browsing history — but their ********* failed by just one vote Wednesday, bringing warrantless searches of web-browsing history one step closer to becoming law.

    "When you talk about web browsing and searches, you're talking about some of the most sensitive, most personal, and most private details of Americans' lives. Every thought that can come into people's heads can be revealed in an internet search or a visit to a website," Wyden said in a statement to Business Insider.

    McConnell's press office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    In a joint op-ed, ACLU counsel Neema Singh Guliani and Americans for Prosperity analyst Billy Easley decried warrantless web-browsing searches as "secret spying" and "unjust."

    As it weighs the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, the Senate is also considering *********s that would give the attorney general more oversight of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court, which handles investigations into political candidates.


    #2
    :wank: :wank:

    Comment


      #3
      McConnell is in the pockets of the Deep State.

      Same with Pelosi and Feinstein.

      Comment


        #4
        Damn. They are going to be surprised.

        Comment


          #5
          Good ole **********s. Cream if the crop. Guess they isn't much difference. Both parties luv draconian/authoritative measures.

          Comment


            #6
            So much for little government and reducing regulations

            Comment


              #7
              Horrible legislation.

              Flies in the face of the Bill of Rights.

              Hopefully there are enough Congresspeople who value our rights and this does not become law.

              And unless it passes hugely in the Senate, Trump can still veto it.

              Comment


                #8
                It’s already been/being done. What’s the real angle here?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
                  Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is pushing forward with an ********* that would let the FBI collect records on Americans' web-browsing and search histories without a warrant this week.

                  McConnell proposed the ********* as part of the renewal of the 2001 Patriot Act, The Daily Beast first reported. The Senate is voting on *********s this week.

                  The McConnell ********* would let Department of Justice officials — overseen by Attorney General Bill Barr — look through anyone's browsing history without the approval of a judge if they deem the browsing history relevant to an investigation. It blocks the FBI from accessing the "content" of people's web-browsing history but would let the FBI access records detailing which sites and search terms people entered.

                  The proposal has drawn backlash from a bipartisan group of senators, as well as from both ******* and conservative civil-liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Prosperity.

                  ********ic Sen. Ron Wyden and ********** Sen. Steve Daines jointly proposed an ********* that would require the FBI to obtain a warrant before accessing people's web-browsing history — but their ********* failed by just one vote Wednesday, bringing warrantless searches of web-browsing history one step closer to becoming law.

                  "When you talk about web browsing and searches, you're talking about some of the most sensitive, most personal, and most private details of Americans' lives. Every thought that can come into people's heads can be revealed in an internet search or a visit to a website," Wyden said in a statement to Business Insider.

                  McConnell's press office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

                  In a joint op-ed, ACLU counsel Neema Singh Guliani and Americans for Prosperity analyst Billy Easley decried warrantless web-browsing searches as "secret spying" and "unjust."

                  As it weighs the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, the Senate is also considering *********s that would give the attorney general more oversight of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court, which handles investigations into political candidates.






                  that is a fkn SHOCKING invasion of privacy

                  unbelievable

                  that is even more unconstitutional than FISA

                  Comment


                    #10
                    ******* Mitch with his old ass better chill. I really hope this gets struck down in the House, and if not struck down by Trump at his desk, but typically they dont push such bills if they dont already have the Presidents agreement to sign.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP