It honestly seems like the biggest pile of croc ever to me, but hey, that's just me... I know the scene is becoming slightly more progressive nowadays and that there may be many who disagree.
Let's just go over the arguments for and against:
For - studies of hyper-left wing scientists paid for by the UN
Against - numerous natural ice ages
- evidence of flood and drought in the bible
- human common sense
- studies of intelligent right-wing scientists not funded by biased institutions
Let's just go over the arguments for and against:
For - studies of hyper-left wing scientists paid for by the UN
Against - numerous natural ice ages
- evidence of flood and drought in the bible
- human common sense
- studies of intelligent right-wing scientists not funded by biased institutions
Comment