Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you believe in global warming?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by -Kev- View Post
    You hit the nail on the head. I�ve been tired of arguing about it for a couple of years now. I just look over such discussions. We have ecologically fcked up Earth so bad, but people who disagree don�t even know what fresh air feels like.

    Most people don�t know what real fresh, clean oxygen feels like. They have no concept of what clean air is supposed to feel like in your body. So you can�t blame them for denying global warming. The less civilization in an area, the closer the air we breathe is to how Earth is intended to be. It�s ridiculously different and your body appreciates it. You just feel the inside of your body bursting with what feels like energy. Not like some Dragon Ball Z energy lol, you just feel like your body woke up. Feels great.



    Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
    If tomorrow the environment of earth was suddenly reverted back to 2000 years ago, you have to wonder? How US humans now would react physiologically. Superman is just a normal man on his home planet, he is only strong on Earth due to the changes in environment 'Medical industry has not improved humans, just keeps them alive in a sickened state'

    But yes that aside, it is really just common sense human practices are negatively effecting the earth's ecosystem 'There are some theories on whether humans evolved from parasites' that is probably just the sinful nature that the bible speaks about.

    But give credit where it is due? I do read things about the OZONE layer repairing itself, which is proof that the work some of these environmentalist do is working to a certain extent.




    * sigh *

    human practices negatively effecting the earth's ecosystem... and mankind's carbon emission heating up the atmosphere... are clearly two very different things

    FACT: it is obvious that we need to be kinder to the planet, even birds do not shlt in their own nest... no shlt sherlocks

    FACT: it has NEVER been proven that mankinds carbon emission is heating up the atmosphere

    PRINCE... how the fk have the environmentalists " fixed " the ozone layer?

    guys... the data faking... ???

    the data faking mentioned by those three experts

    what... just... coincidence... or, somehow irrelevant... ?

    why would you ignore that ?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
      * sigh *

      human practices negatively effecting the earth's ecosystem... and mankind's carbon emission heating up the atmosphere... are clearly two very different things

      FACT: it is obvious that we need to be kinder to the planet, even birds do not shlt in their own nest... no shlt sherlocks

      FACT: it has NEVER been proven that mankinds carbon emission is heating up the atmosphere

      PRINCE... how the fk have the environmentalists " fixed " the ozone layer?

      guys... the data faking... ???

      the data faking mentioned by those three experts

      what... just... coincidence... or, somehow irrelevant... ?

      why would you ignore that ?
      Nasa provides direct proof of Ozone layer repair, due to chemicals ban etc





      Note: I think pollution is has a lot more to do with just gobal warming, I am not sure why people keep specifically picking out this one area. 'But as I have been stating since the beginning of the thread? It is all commonsense, human practices are having a negative effect on the earth's ecosystem.
      Last edited by PRINCEKOOL; 12-26-2019, 05:42 AM.

      Comment


        #23
        Yes, but don't really care. It's sad that animals die thousands of miles away and all that, and that in decades to come the planet will be hotter, have some unpredictable weather etc. but I'm not gonna do anything about it. I'm not saving the polar bears by turning off my TV 15 minutes earlier or whatever it is Greta wants of me. I don't care about people of the future, they will probaby have some great technology that means they're overall better off than us even if there are a few more tsunamis. Then some genius scientist will come along and fix everything, or we'll just move to Mars, and all the ****** protesting will have been for nothing.

        I do believe in some environmental causes, we should stop large companies dumping **** into the ocean and hold them accountable for pollution with large fines. Air quality does impact on your health and the government should protect people from that

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
          Nasa provides direct proof of Ozone layer repair, due to chemicals ban etc



          Note: I think pollution is has a lot more to do with just gobal warming, I am not sure why people keep specifically picking out this one area. 'But as I have been stating since the beginning of the thread?






          top scientists who have worked for NASA testified that NASA is using fake data

          ANOTHER CLIMATE SCIENTIST WITH IMPECCABLE CREDENTIALS BREAKS RANKS: �OUR MODELS ARE MICKEY-MOUSE MOCKERIES OF THE REAL WORLD?/b>

          SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 CAP ALLON

          Dr. Mototaka Nakamura received a Doctorate of Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and for nearly 25 years specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC and Duke University.

          From 1990 to 2014, Nakamura worked on cloud dynamics and forces mixing atmospheric and ocean flows on medium to planetary scales. His bases were MIT (for a Doctor of Science in meteorology), Georgia Institute of Technology, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Duke and Hawaii Universities and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.

          He�s published 20+ climate papers on fluid dynamics.

          There is no questioning his credibility or knowledge.

          The good doctor has accused the orthodox scientists of �data falsification?in the form adjusting historical temperature data down to inflate today�s subtle warming trend ?something Tony Heller has been proving for years on his website realclimatescience.com.







          It is all commonsense, human practices are having a negative effect on the earth's ecosystem.


          the only common-sense is... human practices, negatively impacting the environment... and human carbon emission, causing the atmosphere to heat up... are two completely different things

          you tree-huggers are 100% correct about the environment, I give you my total support... but you mugs have been swept up with the global-warming scam, just like everyone else

          FACT #1: they faked data
          FACT #2: there is only one reason why they would fake data

          based on FACT #1 and FACT #2... FACT: I will believe the DOZENS of top scientists and climatologists who insist that the global-warming *********s are wrong

          it is clearly fkn obvious that the sun is responsible for heating up this - AND EVERY OTHER - planet... which are (coincidentally lol) also warming up

          the reason why they need to fake the trends in regional models, is because the current climate is WELL-WITHIN expected fluctuations THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN RECORDED HERE ON EARTH

          there is literally nothing to see here

          go on... post me a pic of litter in the ocean, or a leveled rain-forest... and then somehow confuse that with global-warming

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Clegg View Post
            Yes, but don't really care. It's sad that animals die thousands of miles away and all that, and that in decades to come the planet will be hotter, have some unpredictable weather etc. but I'm not gonna do anything about it. I'm not saving the polar bears by turning off my TV 15 minutes earlier or whatever it is Greta wants of me. I don't care about people of the future, they will probaby have some great technology that means they're overall better off than us even if there are a few more tsunamis. Then some genius scientist will come along and fix everything, or we'll just move to Mars, and all the ****** protesting will have been for nothing.

            I do believe in some environmental causes, we should stop large companies dumping **** into the ocean and hold them accountable for pollution with large fines. Air quality does impact on your health and the government should protect people from that




            I 100% support environmentalism

            our current path is clearly not sustainable

            nobody should want to leave the world in a worse condition for their children

            but that global-warming scam is just total nonsense

            suggesting that cow-farts wrecked the ozone layer is borderline lunacy

            how many scams has Al Gore run now... ?

            the cow-fart/ozone-layer nonsense is fkn ridiculous, even for him

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              top scientists who have worked for NASA testified that NASA is using fake data

              ANOTHER CLIMATE SCIENTIST WITH IMPECCABLE CREDENTIALS BREAKS RANKS: “OUR MODELS ARE MICKEY-MOUSE MOCKERIES OF THE REAL WORLD”

              SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 CAP ALLON

              Dr. Mototaka Nakamura received a Doctorate of Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and for nearly 25 years specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC and Duke University.

              From 1990 to 2014, Nakamura worked on cloud dynamics and forces mixing atmospheric and ocean flows on medium to planetary scales. His bases were MIT (for a Doctor of Science in meteorology), Georgia Institute of Technology, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Duke and Hawaii Universities and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.

              He’s published 20+ climate papers on fluid dynamics.

              There is no questioning his credibility or knowledge.

              The good doctor has accused the orthodox scientists of “data falsification” in the form adjusting historical temperature data down to inflate today’s subtle warming trend — something Tony Heller has been proving for years on his website realclimatescience.com.











              the only common-sense is... human practices, negatively impacting the environment... and human carbon emission, causing the atmosphere to heat up... are two completely different things

              you tree-huggers are 100% correct about the environment, I give you my total support... but you mugs have been swept up with the global-warming scam, just like everyone else

              FACT #1: they faked data
              FACT #2: there is only one reason why they would fake data

              based on FACT #1 and FACT #2... FACT: I will believe the DOZENS of top scientists and climatologists who insist that the global-warming *********s are wrong

              it is clearly fkn obvious that the sun is responsible for heating up this - AND EVERY OTHER - planet... which are (coincidentally lol) also warming up

              the reason why they need to fake the trends in regional models, is because the current climate is WELL-WITHIN expected fluctuations THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN RECORDED HERE ON EARTH

              there is literally nothing to see here

              go on... post me a pic of litter in the ocean, or a leveled rain-forest... and then somehow confuse that with global-warming
              Top scientist who have worked at Nasa? But they don't work there anymore.

              Again it is just commonsense, and I think my links have more credibility.

              Once people have mind their minds up on what they believe, IT will be difficult for them to change their minds.

              What is commonsense for me, is a conspiracy in your eyes.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
                Top scientist who have worked at Nasa? But they don't work there anymore.

                Again it is just commonsense, and I think my links have more credibility.

                Once people have mind their minds up on what they believe, IT will be difficult for them to change their minds.

                What is commonsense for me, is a conspiracy in your eyes.



                anyone who believes that cow-farts destroyed the ozone layer is a total mug

                and those scientists are OPENLY stating that NASA is full-of shlt...

                so why would they work for NASA, and why would NASA hire them...?

                again...

                Dr. Mototaka Nakamura received a Doctorate of Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and for nearly 25 years specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC and Duke University.

                From 1990 to 2014, Nakamura worked on cloud dynamics and forces mixing atmospheric and ocean flows on medium to planetary scales. His bases were MIT (for a Doctor of Science in meteorology), Georgia Institute of Technology, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Duke and Hawaii Universities and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.

                He�s published 20+ climate papers on fluid dynamics.

                There is no questioning his credibility or knowledge.


                and this guy is even MORE experienced, he is an absolute expert...

                ... ...

                ... he is much more credible than NASA, and any other government agency

                no agenda > agenda

                FACT: it has never been proven that mankind's carbon emission causes the atmosphere to heat up... and when the global-warming *********s were presented with an opportunity to step up and prove their point, they got caught faking data

                the faked data mentioned above, is not the faked data that I am referring to now... data that was presented at a global-warming conference in 2012 was proven by independent scientists to have been falsified... as-in, changed from the original source material to support the global-warming claim... COMPLETELY faked

                it is just nonsense

                you tree-huggers are being played like a fiddle

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  anyone who believes that cow-farts destroyed the ozone layer is a total mug

                  and those scientists are OPENLY stating that NASA is full-of shlt...

                  so why would they work for NASA, and why would NASA hire them...?

                  again...





                  and this guy is even MORE experienced, he is an absolute expert...

                  ... ...

                  ... he is much more credible than NASA, and any other government agency

                  no agenda > agenda

                  FACT: it has never been proven that mankind's carbon emission causes the atmosphere to heat up... and when the global-warming *********s were presented with an opportunity to step up and prove their point, they got caught faking data

                  the faked data mentioned above, is not the faked data that I am referring to now... data that was presented at a global-warming conference in 2012 was proven by independent scientists to have been falsified... as-in, changed from the original source material to support the global-warming claim... COMPLETELY faked

                  it is just nonsense

                  you tree-huggers are being played like a fiddle
                  If you was sitting in a room full of Carbon Dioxide,would it kill you? The answer would probably be yes. You would also not be so smug and sure about yourself, in that sort of situation 'You would be hoping that there where afew tree's around to help you out'.

                  Infact ANYONE who thinks Carbon Emissions are so great, go away? And fill a room full of Carbon Dioxide, then sit in that room and breath it all in.

                  Let me make this clear? Marginalizing this down to just Carbon Emissions, is just one of many humans practices that are having a negative effect upon the ecosystem and nature.

                  It is all just commonsense, but I am convince that people within society these days are suffering from issues 'Which inhibit their perception'

                  People have got big issues, and seem to be struggling with very simple things. 'Never-mind fluid dynamics, I knew the answer to this thread when I was 3 years old' It is commonsense.

                  You are not going to change your mind at this time, as you seem very passionate about your stance.

                  Nothing personal.
                  Last edited by PRINCEKOOL; 12-26-2019, 09:58 PM.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Furn View Post
                    Letting the bible references as scientific evidence slide.

                    You're asking the wrong question.

                    The question should be do you believe in cheap, clean renewable energy ?

                    You don't need to believe in man made climate change to know that fossil fuels are finite, and we'll eventually need a new source of energy and that's where the smart countries are investing.

                    So unless you wanna be buying your energy from China for the rest of time you need to get on it because they are.
                    Well said. It's coming to the point where renewable energy will be cheaper in the long run. Fission reactors are dangerous and the spent nuclear fuel is toxic. Coal, gas and oil heat are major polluters. So we can sit around with our thumbs up or ass or be proactive and end our dependancy on fossil fuels. Sea levels are rising possibly due to a combination of natural factors and CO2 emissions. If we can reduce our share hopefully we can lessen the impact. That's my take anyway.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      I do believe it to a certain extent. We are leaving a foot print because of modern society and over population. I say we have to take care of our planet. I don't believe like the envrironmentalist whackos believe it. In 12 years we are going to be dead as per them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP