It's a stretch to you, because you wouldn't give Fury an ounce of respect and credibility if we offered you money to do so.
We can talk all day about Wlad not being troubled by this fighter or that fighter, but two facts remain that make comments like this silly: Wlad has never faced a monster like Fury, and Wlad has dominated the weakest era in HW history.
- Wladimir dominates like no other boxer before the strongest era of HW boxing by any measure possible. That is totally undisputable. Any attempt to claim this era is anything less than either the best or nearly the best falls squarely in the realm of Old Time Nut Baggery (OTNB).
- Wladimir has faced opponents of coomparable size to Fury. Ok so Fury might be the tallest+heftiest good opponent, but he is also featherfisted for his size and has possibly the shakiest chin of all the big boxers Wlad has beat. He is also technically, skill-wise, one of the shoddiest.
Fury might have skills better than Wach say (a big "might") but he has less power and about 1/8th the chin.
Wladimir has faced opponents of coomparable size to Fury. Ok so Fury might be the tallest+heftiest good opponent, but he is also featherfisted for his size and has possibly the shakiest chin of all the big boxers Wlad has beat. He is also technically, skill-wise, one of the shoddiest.
Fury might have skills better than Wach say (a big "might") but he has less power and about 1/8th the chin.
Fury is the most skilled fighter Wlad has ever faced, and comparing his skills to Wach is laughable.
Fury is the most skilled fighter Wlad has ever faced, and comparing his skills to Wach is laughable.
Featherfisted doe!!
sorry but fury isnt as skilled as byrd,,,ibragimov,,,chambers,,,chageav,,haye or povetkin. he is a threat tho with his size and workrate along with wlads age
Comment