Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who was the Bigger Puncher Robinson, Hearns, Mccellan, Mugabi or Graziano?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Who was the Bigger Puncher Robinson, Hearns, Mccellan, Mugabi or Graziano?

    Who was the Bigger Puncher Robinson, Hearns, Mccellan, Mugabi or Graziano?

    #2
    Hearns threw nuclear bombs.

    Comment


      #3
      Diddnt the ring magazine do a pound4pound punchers list a while ago ??? wasnt Mclellan 28 and Julian Jackson 27....hearns was 18 !
      Last edited by CiganoBoxer; 06-10-2010, 02:29 PM.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Mrpedigree View Post
        Diddnt the ring magazine do a pound4pound punchers list a while ago ??? wasnt Mclellan 28 and Julian Jackson 27....hearns was 18 !
        Think this is it mate!



        From those people i would pick Hearns.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Joey Giardello View Post
          Who was the Bigger Puncher Robinson, Hearns, Mccellan, Mugabi or Graziano?
          Robinson threw the most beautiful punches you ever saw, yet I would give Hearns a slight edge in power. Hearns had the greatest right cross in 147 pound history, and his left hook to the body was fierce. SRR's left hook was better, so a slight edge goes to the Hit Man in terms of overall power.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by The Iron Man View Post
            Think this is it mate!



            From those people i would pick Hearns.
            I think Prince Naseem is rated too low at 46. I hated the guy, but his power at 122 and 126 was ridiculous.

            Comment


              #7
              McClellan was huge compared to the rest, I believe nearly 180 lbs by fight time. Pound for pound I'd say that Hearns was the biggest puncher, a 147 lber who could knock out light heavyweights.
              Last edited by TheGreatA; 06-10-2010, 03:40 PM.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by 1SILVA View Post
                I think Prince Naseem is rated too low at 46. I hated the guy, but his power at 122 and 126 was ridiculous.
                Agreed....Manny Stewart said that Nassem Hamed was the biggest puncher he ever held mits for

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Iron Man View Post
                  Think this is it mate!



                  From those people i would pick Hearns.
                  Guys, read the title of that list: It's "greatest" punchers not "hardest" punchers.....Power is only one critera that the ratings are based on.

                  Poet

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by 1SILVA View Post
                    I think Prince Naseem is rated too low at 46. I hated the guy, but his power at 122 and 126 was ridiculous.
                    Co-sign


                    Originally posted by 1SILVA View Post
                    Robinson threw the most beautiful punches you ever saw, yet I would give Hearns a slight edge in power. Hearns had the greatest right cross in 147 pound history, and his left hook to the body was fierce. SRR's left hook was better, so a slight edge goes to the Hit Man in terms of overall power.
                    I agree with this too,robinson was the better puncher in terms of technique but hearns had that raw power,his right hand was like a kick from a mule-and i think thats being generous to the mule!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP