Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Any confirmation about Turkilency's plan of reducing the size of the ring?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Any confirmation about Turkilency's plan of reducing the size of the ring?

    I'm sure you know what I'm hinting at.

    #2
    What's your opinion on this?

    Is it a good idea to reduce the size of the ring to avoid too much running in boxing?​

    We can't complain about the weather all the time and not do anything about it.

    Comment


      #3
      I think they should stick to the standard 20x20. No more 22’. Maybe go 18x18 at the smallest.

      I remember watching MBilli fight Desmond Nicholson in Canada , and every time Nicholson took a step back and he wasn’t “running”, he was basically already on the ropes in what I believe was a 16x16 ring. I know we don’t want “runners” but that’s definitely too small, and I wouldn’t want personally.
      Last edited by edpboxing; 06-21-2025, 03:27 PM.

      Comment


        #4
        Go 18’ x 18’, Your Excellency.

        And maybe even experiment with 16’ x 16’ like they used to have back in the 1920’s through 1940’s. Let’s see how viable that is.

        No Tom and Jerrys would survive that.

        Comment


          #5
          how about no clinching/holding as well. Or at the very least penalize them fast for excessive clinching/holding.

          Comment


            #6
            I'm all for it. If they're good "boxers" then they can be mobile and not get hit in any size ring.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by ippo View Post
              how about no clinching/holding as well. Or at the very least penalize them fast for excessive clinching/holding.
              the runners will adapt and become huggers

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by edpboxing View Post
                I think they should stick to the standard 20x20. No more 22’. Maybe go 18x18 at the smallest.

                I remember watching MBilli fight Desmond Nicholson in Canada , and every time Nicholson took a step back and he wasn’t “running”, he was basically already on the ropes in what I believe was a 16x16 ring. I know we don’t want “runners” but that’s definitely too small, and I wouldn’t want personally.
                Turki wants 18x18 to be the norm

                but boxing is all about money

                I’m expecting they’ll make 22x22 and 20x20 exceptions when it benefits a massive cash cow a-side

                Comment


                  #9
                  Can’t find info on ring size for the Artur Bivol fights

                  I guess trilogy will be 18x18

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Turki should do it. He's the one getting slammed by critics when his fights are boring to watch. Why not? I don't see anyone who would stop him from implementing it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP