Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL
View Post
Is it really a good fight? Really? I don't think so, not to the extent certain folk are trying to claim.
Boxing is show business, and the fact of boxing reality is? There are by far more bigger block buster fighters and match ups 'That can be made for Anthony Joshua'.
Since Joshua lost his second fight to Oleksandr Uysk 'Eddie Hearn's match making for Joshua, has been some of the best match making he has ever produced for any fighter in their career'.
Joshua's objective and goal to fight his way back into title contention, has been charted in such a way 'That it has inspired and made people start believe in Joshua again. This has only been achievable, because of the fights Joshua has been fighting and the manner in which he has been performing'.
Almost every single fight since his comeback fight vs Jermaine Franklin, has been accompanied by a narrative, theme and something to gain beyond just titles.
Joseph Parker is a solid fighter, his efforts are commendable. I have really enjoyed his partnership with Andy Lee, and how they have both achieved solid wins together.
'But there are many more better fights, that can be made for Joshua. Fights that have a narrative, theme and something for Joshua to gain beyond just titles'.
The potential third fight with Andy Ruiz Junior, Deontay Wilder if he gets past Zhilei Zhang, or a fight for a vacate World title against the victor of Dubois vs Hrgovic.
All of those fights are way more intriguing, and better match making for Joshua 'Than a fight with Joseph Parker. A fighter who Joshua has already beaten quite easily, and a fighter who we have all witnessed being consummately beaten, ether in a skill for skill fight vs Anthony Joshua or just straight up brutality vs Joe Joyce'.
Anthony Joshua needs to be making statements, creating tectonic shifts in the game with every single fight 'And that is what he has been doing. Parker vs Joshua II, is not that type of fight'.
Ruiz Junior vs Joshua III 'Is that type of fight. There are still people out there within the boxing community, pushing the narrative that Ruiz Junior done something real bad to Joshua in the first fight.
If people believe that Ruiz Junior vs Joshua I 'Was a bad loss, then I would advise them not to watch a potential third fight between Ruiz Junior and Joshua. Because Anthony Joshua would not be coming into that fight to just merely out skill and box Ruiz Junior over 12 rounds, Joshua has already achieved such a feat easily in their original rematch'.
Anthony Joshua right now as we speak, is the only top level Heavyweight who is decimating, obliterating, systematically destroying his opponents.
Note: My advise to team Parker would be to be wise and think about their next moves. And I would say that his some of his supporters need to pipe down, because if they don't 'They are going to get Parker beaten in a unnecessary fight'.
Parker vs Whyte II 'In the present is a good fight for Parker, and very winnable'.
Parker vs Joshua II 'For me the narrative, the theme is not that intriguing. And for specifically for Joshua? He is not gaining much from beating Parker again, even if he beats him down real bad' etc.
Comment